Panchayat Elections Voting Going On | in Rayalaseema Dists

Contents

The Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation refused to consider voting on the blockchain 'raw'

The Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation refused to consider voting on the blockchain “raw”
CONTENT

  • The Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation considers successful the last voting on the blockchain

  • As a result of the September 2019 elections, a database with the personal data of voters turned out to be online

  • Attackers already provide services for the sale of a whole package of data, including SNILS, TIN and credit history

International consortium of news organizations, developing transparency standards.

The CEC of the Russian Federation does not believe that electronic voting technology is still “raw” despite the massive leak of passport data of voters

A member of the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation, Anton Lopatin, during a press conference refused to name the “raw” technology of remote voting, writes IA REGNUM.

Lopatin noted that the electronic voting technology does not have any fundamental differences from the Moscow version, the main methods of which remain “unchanged”.

Join our telegram channel to be in course on the main trends in the crypto market.

“Why don’t I agree that it is raw. The basic technologies are the same as in Moscow. Blockchain technology is applied as in Moscow.

The Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation refused to consider voting on the blockchain 'raw'

Why does the CEC remember Moscow with a kind word when it talks about remote electronic voting? Because the basic approaches that have already been used before are unchanged, “- IA REGNUM quotes Lopatin as saying.

The technology of voting on the blockchain, created by Russian experts, has already been repeatedly covered in the media due to the massive leak of confidential data. 

In August 2020, a database of participants in electronic voting on amendments to the Constitution was discovered on the darknet. The leakage amounted to 1.1 million lines of personal data. For each line, the seller asked for $ 1.5.

The authenticity of the leaked data was confirmed by the founder of DeviceLock Ashot Hovhannisyan.

Useless information

While passport numbers alone are not useful, in addition to other personal data they have value..

For example, attackers can already identify the owner of the passport by the available data, together with the data of SNILS, TIN, credit history, writes Kommersant.

Learn how to trade on cryptocurrency market together with a partner BeInCrypto – cryptocurrency exchange StormGain

The BeInCrypto editorial staff previously reported that even during the September elections, the electronic voting system malfunctioned already in the first hours of work, unable to cope with the influx of voters.

The main complaints were about the impossibility of authorization in the system, and upon repeated attempts to log in, they received a notification of a successful vote.

Some voters could not track their votes in the voting monitoring system: as a result of a failure and reboot of the encryption system, about a thousand electronic ballots were frozen.

What do you think? Share with us with our thoughts in the comments and join discussions in our Telegram channel.

Disclaimer

All information, contained on our website, published on principles of good faith and objectivity, and for informational purposes only.

The Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation refused to consider voting on the blockchain 'raw'

Reader yourself bears full responsibility for any actions, committed by him on the basis of information, obtained from our website.

Share Article

By admin